A brief discussion on the chaos in the AI Agent market: Can it create a new round of narrative miracles that surpass DeF

原作者：浩天（X： @tme l0 211 )

In my last article, I shared the logical relationship between AI DePIN, AI MEME, AI Agent and other AI narratives. However, when exploring the potential Alpha of AI, the question arises: should I choose AI MEME that may come from a conspiracy group with a strong wealth effect but frequently replaced? Should I choose a protocol framework that is still in the early stages of building infra? Or should I choose some cool single AI with specific application scenarios? To be honest, I was confused for a long time. The following are just some superficial opinions:

1) There is no doubt about the general trend. AI Agent is neither an asset nor an application, but a new paradigm of narrative in the large-scale blockchain ecosystem.

In other words, the advent of AI Agent is like the DeFi Summer in blockchain in 2020. It will generate a huge new bubble narrative cycle of Build+Speculation around the issuance, custody, and trading of AI Agent tokens; infrastructure construction, frameworks, standards, communications, stacking, and SaaS packaging; Application development, operations, aggregation, iteration, and implementation.

DeFi has driven the glory of the last bull market, and has stimulated much market vitality around the three carriages of stablecoins + lending + DeX derivatives. According to incomplete statistics, the total locked value of multi-chain DeFi is 134.6 billion, the circulation of stablecoins has exceeded 100 billion US dollars, the monthly transaction volume of DEX has reached 372.3 billion US dollars, and the lending volume is nearly 20 billion US dollars, etc. The market size and ecological importance of the entire DeFi industry are all in these data that have grown amazingly and are still being refreshed, which does not include the various chains and applications generated by DeFi, such as MCAPFDV and other broader data.

In my opinion, AI Agent will also create a new round of narrative miracles that may even surpass the DeFi narrative. 200 B, 500 B of imagination space? Don’t always think about the new DeFi Summer 2.0. Please keep up with the current AI Agent Summer narrative trend and don’t fall behind.

2) Based on this logic, let’s look at the current “chaos” in the AI Agent market:

1) Community verbal battles and competition for leadership among AI MEMEs such as $GOAT, $FARTCOIN, and $ACT; 2) Competition among AI Agent framework standards such as $VIRTUAL and $AI16Z; 3) Competition among derivative infras such as the issuance and circulation of assets such as $VVAIFU and $GRIFFAIN; 4) Competition among single AI Agent applications such as $AIXBT, $AVA, and $BULLY, etc.

You will find that it is still too early. The various lending platforms, derivatives, machine gun pools, governance tokens, etc. that appear on DeFi at least have the basic execution framework and standards provided by chains such as Ethereum, while the AI Agent ecosystem does not even have its own infra conditions. From the perspective of ecological plasticity, the industry narrative opportunities brought by AI Agent are much greater than DeFi;

In other words, these chaos are not really chaos. If you are optimistic about the development of AI Agent narratives and the directions of various sectors, assets with a certain market value and a corresponding user base are all high-quality assets before the huge AI Agent narrative breaks out. Assets in the categories such as YFI, CRV, UNI, DYDX, etc. have reached FDV market value heights of tens of billions, so you don’t have to panic.

Of course, having confidence does not mean you can do whatever you want. Don’t forget that in addition to the first uncle, there are also pseudo-value assets like the second uncle, and this type of asset will always quietly invade your wallet in a manner that is more attractive in the short term but toxic in the long term.

3) Because it is still in the early stages of the narrative, there is no point in persuading everyone not to participate in some AI MEMEs that are clearly operated by conspiracy groups. After all, no one knows how much wealth effect an early track can generate, and some framework standards that seem to be more valuable and have been implemented may also face the possibility of being overtaken by competitors at any time.

In short, it is difficult to give a clear logic for Alpha discovery. I will only share my personal investment research logic for reference:

1. AI MEME only considers leading coins such as $GOAT, which are the originators of narratives. There is no logic. If you have to say one, it is like the consensus coin such as Bitcoin came before the smart contract technology delivery coin such as Ethereum.

Although MEME is mainly speculative in its early stages, its role in educating the market and cultivating user awareness cannot be ignored, just like the role of DOGE in popularizing 加密貨幣貨幣。

2. AI Agent infra is very important and is underestimated in the long run. For example, early frameworks such as $ELIZA have rich Github open source libraries and a wide range of applications. Although they are indeed in their early stages and may be siphoned away by other stronger framework standards at any time, their absolute advantages in open source sharing and first-mover advantage are barriers. Better frameworks will most likely be on top of it, which may affect its growth, but will 去中心化金融nitely not eliminate it.

If we regard ELIZA as the EVM in the AI Agent era, new frameworks such as EVM++ and EVM Compatible will inevitably emerge to complement it.

3. AI Agent asset issuance, custody, and trading are currently still at the MEME-based asset issuance narrative level. It is necessary to lock in the platform value and not be confused by the junk assets on the platform.

The logic is very simple. AI Agent is essentially a process of AI scene value landing based on Crypto incentive mechanism. In the early stage, infra, applications, protocol framework, etc. are not mature yet. How can there be so many super applications of AIXBT level? What does the convenience of issuing coins bring? Understand it? In the end, it is just a bubble trap to create heat for asset issuance platforms such as VIRTUAL and VVAIFU.

Therefore, don’t chase AI Agent super applications too much, unless there is an absolute information gap, otherwise when you see the market value at that time, the cost performance will not be high. However, it is different if you lock in the innovative platform infra;

4. There is still a large gap in the infra construction of AI Agent. For example, early frameworks such as ELIZA only solve the problems of LLM large model and AI Agent dialogue mechanism, and are applied to application scenarios such as Twitter and Discord, but they are more about matching web2 information. It is worth looking forward to when there will be an ELIZA++ version that can connect the ELIZA framework and 网页3 transaction scenarios based on the public chain paradigm;

For example, although AI Agent asset issuance platforms such as Virtual and VVAIFU can issue assets quickly, they still lack a lot in the subsequent decentralized custody of assets and AMM-style intention-based transactions. When will the previously hotly discussed AI Agent+TEE private key management method mature? Can asset issuance platforms extend new gameplay in transactions, and come up with more interesting trading gameplay and incentive models?

Also, can there be some chains that build interaction standards for AI Agents, become the Cosmos of the AI Agent era, and provide standard interoperability capabilities? Or some chains that build permanent Memory modular storage for AI Agents, and build the necessary DA capabilities for AI Agents? There are also some AI Agent visualization tools, execution engines, modular combination packaging services, and so on.

With these technologies and market-driven supporting infra, will you still be anxious about a bunch of MEMEs that you don’t understand?

多於。

As for the various types of layer 1, high-performance chains, cross-chain infra, chain abstraction, DA combination chains, layer 2, Restaking and other perfect infrastructure built on the smart contract paradigm in the past, where is the way out? In addition to the original infra landing application PMF delivery implementation problem, a breakthrough point is the new concept of AI Agent narrative.

Therefore, any chain that can provide AI Agent with some communication protocols, DA, application development and other service capabilities is worth paying attention to. Of course, there are definitely chains that are purely for the sake of concept, but they are better than chains that are complacent and rely on their old capital.

In any case, please stay tuned to the AI Agent track and welcome the arrival of this epic bull market.

原文連結

This article is sourced from the internet: A brief discussion on the chaos in the AI Agent market: Can it create a new round of narrative miracles that surpass DeFi?

Related: New thinking on public chain valuation: L1 premium is in doubt, ETHs sovereignty is questioned

Original author: taetaehoho Original translation: TechFlow L1 premium, moneyness, xREV/TEV… Do these concepts really exist? Special thanks to @smyyguy and @purplepil l3 m for reviewing and providing feedback on this post. If you are not familiar with REV, you can read this article by @jon_charb . The following multiples are based on valuation data as of 12:00 noon (ET) on October 30, 2024. L2’s profit is its revenue (including base fees and priority fees) minus on-chain operating costs (such as L1 data calls, blobs, and verification costs). Arbitrum, Optimism, Zksync, and Scroll have data for the past twelve months, while Blast only has three quarters of data (which makes its multiples inflated compared to other projects). ETH and Solana also have data for the past twelve months. A few notes:…