TechFlow가 편집하고 편집함
손님: Myles Oneil , formerly of Fidelity; Vance Spencer , co-founder of Framework Ventures ; Michael Anderson , co-founder of Framework Ventures
중재자: Michael Ippolito
팟캐스트 출처: Bell Curve
Can Crypto Survive a Recession? | Roundup
Air Date: August 3, 2024
주요 요점 요약
In this episode, the Roundup team and Myles ONeil dive into hot topics from a turbulent week for the markets. They discuss the recent Compound Finance governance attack, the first week of trading for the Ethereum ETF, and how teams should handle 토큰 잠금 해제. Additionally, they ask if crypto is now a bipartisan issue and what governance tokens should be classified as. Finally, they speculate on whether we are entering a recession.
Trumps speech at Bitcoin conference
-
Michael Ippolito mentioned that Trumps speech at the Bitcoin Conference attracted a lot of attention. His speech covered a variety of topics, some of which may have been intended to cater to the needs of the Bitcoin community. He promised to fire Gary Gensler on the first day and said he would release Ross Ulbricht, which triggered warm applause from the audience. Although Vance doubted whether Trump had the power to fire Gensler, he also noticed Trumps surprise at the audiences reaction.
Proposal for a Bitcoin Strategic Reserve
-
The host mentioned that Trumps mention of a strategic Bitcoin reserve in his speech sparked widespread media coverage. Compared to the more comprehensive proposals made by Cynthia Lummis and Robert F. Kennedy, Trumps promise was relatively simple, that is, to no longer sell the Bitcoin already held by the United States. Michael pointed out that while this promise was positive, the United States actually started selling Bitcoin again.
The future of cryptocurrency policy
-
Michael believes that Trump will be the candidate who supports cryptocurrency, and other candidates may appear insincere if they try to cater to this trend. He mentioned that although Trumps promise is simple, it will have a positive impact on the cryptocurrency market if it can be translated into actual policies. The guests discussed whether the government should buy Bitcoin and how to allow crypto companies to operate in the United States without triggering unfair prosecution.
Government-held crypto assets
-
Vance said that the government may hold various crypto assets without being disclosed, but it is not clear what the specific situation is. Overall, although Trumps speech sparked heated discussions, the guests were more concerned about how to achieve a clear policy framework in the future to promote the healthy development of cryptocurrencies.
Is cryptocurrency now a bipartisan issue?
Cryptocurrency鈥檚 Bipartisan Problem
-
Michael mentioned that recent efforts are intended to promote cryptocurrency as a bilateral issue, but he expressed doubts about the possibility.
-
Vance noted that while Trump may take a proactive approach to crypto policy, the difference in crypto policy may not be huge if Kamala Harris is president. He believes that the future legislative framework will affect the market structure of cryptocurrencies.
Political stance and votes
-
Myles said that the anti-cryptocurrency stance has a negative impact on votes, especially in an election year.
-
The host added that the Democratic Party鈥檚 current attitude towards cryptocurrencies may not be as open as before, but also believes that this is still an undetermined factor. He mentioned that trying to confront the major political parties is not a wise choice and believes that interactions should be conducted in a constructive manner.
Election impact on markets
-
Michael believes that the market volatility is not entirely due to election factors, and that 70% of the changes may come from structural factors such as liquidity and government sales, while 30% may be related to election-related emotions. He likened the current election situation to the final stage of the game, emphasizing that in the absence of a clear platform, market reactions may be affected by uncertainty.
Kamala Harris political future
-
The guests discussed Kamala Harris political prospects, arguing that her current rise in support is partly due to the contrast between her and current President Biden and former President Trump.
-
The host mentioned that Harris proposed a $10 trillion climate change plan in her previous campaign, but it is not clear what her specific policy stance is. The guests agreed that in the absence of specific policy information, the markets reaction to Harris may fluctuate.
Need to wait for more information
-
Finally, the panelists reached a consensus that market participants should remain cautious until more information is obtained about future political platforms and policies. Michael concluded that this is a waiting game and everyone needs to patiently observe future developments.
Compound Financial Governance Offensive
Compound鈥檚 governance attack
-
The host talked about the recent governance attack on Compound, involving a participant named Humpy, who has been in the crypto space for many years. Humpy voted to allocate himself $25 million in COMP tokens, a proposal that was previously rejected in April but unexpectedly passed this time. The host mentioned that Compounds governance activity has dropped significantly, which may have led to the passage of this proposal.
Progress and Challenges of DAO Governance
-
Myles shared his experience in DAO governance, pointing out that despite the surge in attention to DAOs over the past period of time, the innovation and progress of most DAO tools have stagnated in the bear market. He believes that although some DAO projects have failed, there are still some efficient DAOs, such as Maker and Lido. He emphasized that the improvement of the governance framework is not complicated, but lacks innovation in the current market environment.
Reflection on voting mechanism
-
The moderator proposed a ve (vote-escrowed) mechanism for locking tokens to gain governance rights, which is intended to encourage long-term holders to participate in governance. However, this also raises concerns about activist investors who may influence governance decisions by purchasing tokens.
-
Vance added that the differences in legal protections between DAOs and traditional corporate governance make crypto projects more challenging to govern.
The role of activist investors
-
The guests discussed the role of activist investors in crypto projects, and believed that Humpys behavior might be an attempt to boost a low-lying project through governance. Michael mentioned that while the involvement of activist investors may bring short-term benefits, the lack of a legal framework and governance consistency makes this model difficult to sustain.
The impact of the political environment on the crypto industry
-
The host mentioned that the future political environment may have a profound impact on the crypto industry. If the new government can provide friendly regulatory policies, it may promote more innovation and experimentation.
-
Michael added that the current slowdown in market activity is closely tied to changes in the political situation, especially the upcoming election.
The future of cryptocurrency
-
The guests discussed the potential impact of different political positions on cryptocurrencies, and believed that if the Democratic Party could develop a reasonable regulatory framework, it would help the development of the crypto industry. Michael pointed out that the Democratic Party needs to find a balance between regulation and innovation to attract entrepreneurs who have left due to uncertainty.
If governance tokens are not securities, what are they?
The classification dilemma of governance tokens
-
Myles raised a controversial question about the definition of governance tokens under the legal framework. He asked what governance tokens are if they are not considered securities after five years. He believed that although some tokens may be considered commodities, for protocols like Compound, the dividend and fee switches involved make their nature more complicated.
Comparison between exchanges and governance rights
-
Vance noted that while some tokens are traded on exchanges such as CME, they do not have the characteristics of traditional commodities, such as voting rights or the right to receive dividends from product revenues. This raises further questions about the nature of governance tokens, especially in the absence of a legal framework.
The relationship between the political environment and the crypto industry
-
Vance mentioned that the current relationship between the crypto industry and politics is changing, and believes that the communication channel with Kamala Harris may be smoother than with Biden. He believes that although Harris policies may not be as positive as Trumps, they will generally be better than the current situation.
Public Perception of Cryptocurrency
-
The moderator stressed that despite the technological and economic potential of the cryptocurrency industry, negative public perceptions of cryptocurrencies still exist. He believes that while promoting political change, industry participants need to pay attention to external perceptions and advocate in a positive way.
The balance between struggle and advocacy
-
The moderator mentioned that industry players should avoid overly aggressive rhetoric while fighting for fair treatment, which could deepen the publics negative impression. He suggested fighting in a more constructive way to win public support and understanding.
미래 전망
-
The panelists agreed that despite the many challenges facing cryptocurrencies, the industry still has the opportunity to grow through proper advocacy and policy. Michael added that there may be more information about the political platform in the coming weeks, which will have an impact on the development of the industry.
Are we heading into a recession?
The current state of the stock market
-
Vance mentioned the current performance of the stock market, especially the Russell index, which is down 5%, as an unusual situation. He said that the NASDAQ is also down 3.2%, which could be the beginning of a recession. The unemployment rate has risen to 4.3%, and the market expects a 50 basis point rate cut in September.
The Japanese stock market crisis
-
The host mentioned that the Japanese stock market was experiencing its worst trading day since 1987, falling 6%. This shows the instability of global markets.
Cryptocurrency performance
-
Despite the decline in the U.S. stock market, Bitcoin has performed relatively flat or even slightly higher, which the host believes is a sign that cryptocurrencies may be starting to decouple from traditional stock markets, reflecting different market dynamics.
Changes in the economic environment
-
Vance mentioned that the current economic environment is changing and the unemployment rate may rise further to 5%. He believes that the sense of economic weakness is gradually emerging, which will have an important impact on the upcoming election.
The impact of fiscal spending
-
The host pointed out that despite the pressure on the market, the governments fiscal spending still provides some support, which means that although there is a risk of recession, the economy may not suffer a serious blow due to government spending.
The prospects of the crypto market
-
Vance stressed that rate cuts could have a positive impact on Bitcoin and the crypto market. He believes that the current economic conditions could provide a good opportunity for cryptocurrencies, especially in the face of uncertainty in traditional markets.
미래 전망
-
Panelists agreed that despite the risk of a recession, government spending and upcoming interest rate cuts could provide support to the market. Vance called for a quick rate cut to boost the recovery of the economy and crypto markets.
ETH ETF First Week of Trading
Initial performance of the ETH ETF
-
The host mentioned that the first week of trading for the ETH ETF has ended and the market has performed positively. He pointed out that although GBTC had previously experienced capital outflows, inflows have turned positive in recent days, especially BlackRocks ETF products have performed outstandingly, attracting a large amount of capital inflows.
Bitcoin and ETH capital flows
-
Vance mentioned that the flow of funds for Bitcoin and ETH has been roughly the same recently. He expects BlackRocks ETF to drive inflows into both assets, with Bitcoin inflows of about $1.7 million and ETH inflows of about $970,000 yesterday. He believes that this liquidity will continue to increase.
Grayscale鈥檚 Impact
-
Vance noted that Grayscale鈥檚 outflows still have an impact on the market, but with the success of the ETF, this impact is weakening. He said mini trusts are also helping to absorb the outflows and overall market sentiment is positive.
The outlook for the ETF market
-
The host added that it is the responsibility of BlackRock and other ETF providers to ensure the success of these products, which is a positive signal for the entire market. Their performance will have an important impact on market confidence.
How should the team handle token unlocking?
Background of token unlocking
-
The host mentioned that Namada (a privacy-focused L1 project) proposed to unlock 100% of the token supply at a time during the Token Generation Event (TGE). He explained the background of this practice, saying that many people are tired of the low liquidity, high fully diluted valuation (FDV) token issuance method, which usually leads to investors or teams continuing to sell during the unlocking period within one to two years.
Different perspectives on unlocking time
-
Vance pointed out that the current token unlocking method is not ideal. He believes that the value and attractiveness of the project are the key factors. If successful projects like Ethereum (ETH) or Solana choose to unlock 100% or 0%, the results may not be much different. The quality of the project is the core of determining its value.
The markets self-healing
-
Vance mentioned that the market is self-healing, low-quality projects will face higher listing thresholds, and only more valuable projects will be supported by major exchanges. As the market rethinks token economics, low-liquidity, high-FDV projects will lose their appeal.
The Challenge of Listing Pricing
-
The moderator added to the discussion on listing pricing, mentioning that in the crypto market, many projects set prices too high when they were listed, resulting in a sharp drop in stock prices after listing. He pointed out that this situation is not sustainable and the market needs to find a more reasonable initial price discovery mechanism.
The balance between early-stage investors and retail investors
-
Both speakers agreed that the market needs to create a better balance between early investors who want a quick return on their investment and retail investors who want to participate at a reasonable price.
미래 전망
-
Vance stressed that the market will continue to adjust and reduce investment in low-quality projects, while hoping to avoid losing investors confidence in the crypto market. He mentioned that the loss rate of many meme coins is worrying, and these investors need to be attracted back to the market in the future.
This article is sourced from the internet: Dialogue with Framework Co-founder: Can cryptocurrency survive the economic recession?
Original | Odaily Planet Daily ( @OdailyChina ) Author | Asher ( @Asher_0210 ) Due to the impact of the Mentougou incident and the German government selling Bitcoin, the price of Bitcoin has fallen below $ 54,000 twice recently . However, in the long-short game in recent days, Bitcoin seems to have re-established demand below $ 60,000 , which may indicate that the market is about to improve. At this point, it is a good strategy to reduce short-term operations and participate in early interactions with popular projects. Therefore, Odaily Planet Daily selected the most worthwhile blockchain game projects for everyone to participate in this week based on multiple dimensions such as social media popularity and project popularity – MapleStory Universe, a MapleStory Web3 game developed by NEXON with a…